August 2026 Legislative Update: Which Disability Bills Are Moving Forward?

By Julie Schurman, Esq., Director of Public Policy, The Arc & UCP California Collaboration

August 13 was a major deadline at the California State Capitol. The Assembly and Senate Appropriations Committees decided which bills that would have a cost to the state could continue moving through the Legislature. Bills that passed are now one step closer to the Governor’s desk. Bills that were “held under submission” will not move forward this year.

For The Arc & UCP California Collaboration, there was some good news. Several bills we support made it through Appropriations:

AB 2526 (Muratsuchi) – More Resources for Special Education
AB 2526 would change how certain special education funding is calculated and would provide additional resources to support students with significant disabilities.

AB 2081 (Stefani) – Expanding Home and Community-Based Services
AB 2081 would expand California’s Home and Community-Based Alternatives (HCBA) Waiver, which helps people who might otherwise need institutional care receive services in their homes and communities. Beginning in 2027, the bill would require California to increase the number of available waiver slots by 10,000, in addition to other planned increases. This is a bill that Assembly Member Stefani has repeatedly introduced over a number of years, and has been supported by the Arc of California each time. 

AB 2233 (Ta) – Protecting Access to Autism Treatment
AB 2233 would give families more flexibility in using authorized behavioral health treatment hours. If treatment hours are approved as part of a six-month treatment plan, health plans and insurers generally could not restrict when those hours are used during that authorization period, as long as their use remains consistent with the treatment plan and clinical guidelines.

AB 2414 (Nguyen) – Recognizing Direct Support Professionals
AB 2414 takes an important step toward recognizing the professionalism and value of this workforce. By establishing a clear statutory definition of a Direct Support Professional and directing DDS to develop billing guidance to facilitate training-related pay differentials, this bill supports workforce development, promotes consistency across the developmental services system, and helps lay the foundation for improved recruitment and retention efforts. The bill also ensures that DSPs are appropriately recognized within future DDS rate model reviews, which is the first step toward increasing DSP pay. 

SB 974 (Seyarto) – Special Needs Trusts and Family Homes
The bill would recognize qualifying special needs trusts as an eligible way to transfer certain family property for purposes of California’s applicable property tax exclusion. This could mean that some families will pay less property tax when transferring their family home to their disabled loved one through a Special Needs trust. 

SB 1349 (Gonzalez) – Reviewing California Tax Breaks
SB 1349 would require the Legislative Analyst’s Office to review major state tax expenditures, including whether they are a cost-effective use of public resources and whether savings could be achieved by reducing or limiting them.

AB 880 (Bennett) – Prompt Payments for Nonprofits
AB 880 recognizes that nonprofit organizations providing public services to people with disabilities should be afforded the same basic expectation of timely payment as other entities doing business with the state. The nonprofit status of an organization does not eliminate payroll obligations, operating expenses, or the need for predictable cash flow. If anything, many community-based nonprofits have fewer financial reserves and less access to capital to withstand substantial payment delays. By expanding the Prompt Payment Act’s definition of “grant” to include agreements between state agencies and nonprofit organizations, AB 880 would help establish greater accountability and fairness in the state’s payment practices to non-profits that are paid via Medi-Cal.

Some Important Bills Did Not Move Forward

Unfortunately, several bills supported by The Arc & UCP California Collaboration were held in Appropriations and will not move forward this session. These include AB 1925 (Gonzalez), which proposed studying a statewide permanent disability certification that could potentially reduce the need for people with lifelong disabilities to repeatedly prove their disability; AB 2191 (Quirk-Silva), which would have supported statewide resources for alternate pathways to a high school diploma for students with disabilities; AB 2208 (Stefani), which addressed upcoming federal changes to Medi-Cal; and AB 2360 (Arambula), which would have strengthened plain-language requirements for state government documents.
SB 1202 (Weber Pierson), which would have required California to publicly track Medi-Cal enrollment, disenrollment, work requirements, and exemptions through a new data dashboard, was also held. SB 363 (Wiener), which sought greater accountability around health insurance treatment denials and independent medical reviews, did not advance either.

One Harmful Bill Made it Through Appropriations

AB 2490 (Valencia) – Lowering Experience Requirements for Long-Term Substitute Teachers

Unfortunately, AB 2490 also passed the Senate Appropriations Committee and will continue moving through the Legislature. The Arc & UCP California Collaboration opposes this bill because of its potential impact on students with disabilities.

AB 2490 would allow substitute teachers to spend more than one-third of the school year in a general or special education classroom, with only minimal training and unspecified support. 

Staffing classrooms with untrained teachers is a solution for districts, not students. Students with disabilities deserve qualified and well-prepared educators who understand their individual needs and can implement their Individualized Education Programs (IEPs). The Arc will continue opposing the bill as it moves through the final weeks of the legislative session.

What Happens Next?

For the bills that survived Appropriations, the legislative session is not over. They must still complete their remaining floor votes in the Senate or Assembly before they can be sent to the Governor for consideration.

Other Bill Updates

AB 1575 (Arambula), one of the Arc’s sponsored bills, which would change the term “consumer” in the Lanterman Act to “person eligible for regional center services” is headed to a final floor vote on August 17th. 

AB 2189 (Ngyuen) related to Special Education advocacy will be converted to a budget bill, and is making its way through the 2026 budget bill process, with funding already earmarked for the initiative.  

AB 2324 (Gonzalez), recently signed by the Governor, recognizes the valuable experience of young people who provide care to family members and helps connect those experiences to education and career opportunities in caregiving and direct support professions.

The Arc & UCP California Collaboration will continue advocating for legislation that strengthens services, protects access to health care and education, supports families and the disability workforce, and advances the rights of Californians with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Stay tuned as we head into the final weeks of the 2026 legislative session.

Your Voice Matters: Key Legislative Hearings You Should Know About

By Julie Schurman, Director of Public Policy, The Arc & UCP California Collaboration

As California moves forward with key budget decisions and legislation, several important hearings in the coming days and weeks could directly impact people with developmental disabilities, their families, and the professionals who support them. These proposals include potential cuts to essential services like In-Home Supportive Services (IHSS) and Medi-Cal Dental, as well as legislation that strengthens protections and advances equity for our community. Now is the time to stay informed and engaged. While public testimony must be given in person, there are still meaningful ways to participate—by submitting comments via email, calling committee members and tuning in to watch the hearings live. Your voice matters, and policymakers do pay attention.

Wednesday March 25: Governor’s Proposed Cuts to IHSS

ABOUT IN-HOME SUPPORT SERVICES (IHSS) CUTS:

California is considering a set of proposals that would significantly change the In-Home Supportive Services (IHSS) program by removing key protections and shifting costs in ways that could limit access to care. In response to reduced federal funding tied to H.R.1, the state is looking for ways to reduce spending—putting critical IHSS supports at risk for those who depend on them.

One proposal would eliminate the IHSS Backup Provider Program, which helps ensure individuals continue receiving care if their regular caregiver is unavailable. Without this support, people could be left without assistance for essential daily needs.

Another proposal would end the IHSS Residual Program, which currently allows individuals to continue receiving services for a limited time if their Medi-Cal coverage is interrupted due to administrative issues or eligibility changes. Removing this safeguard could result in an abrupt loss of care.

Additional changes would shift the full cost of increased IHSS service hours to counties, creating financial pressure that could lead to reduced services and uneven access to care across different parts of the state.

POSITION: Oppose Cuts

HEARING DETAILS: Wednesday, March 25 at 1:30 p.m. at State Capitol, Room 444 (enter on L Street). Public comment at the end of the hearing, which could go past 5:00 p.m. Click HERE for full agenda.

WAYS TO GET INVOLVED:

    • Email Assembly Budget Committee with your public comment opposing these cuts to: AsmBudget@asm.ca.gov – Click HERE for sample messaging.
    • Attend hearing in person and participate in public comment at the conclusion of the hearing.
    • Watch Livestream available here

Thursday, March 26: Medi-Cal Dental Budget Cuts 

ABOUT MEDI-CAL DENTAL CUTS: The Governor’s proposed budget includes nearly a $1 billion cut to Medi-Cal Dental, about one third of the program’s total funding. If approved, payments to dentists who accept Medi-Cal would drop by 40 percent to 80 percent, depending on the service. In a recent survey, more than half of dentists said they would stop accepting Medi-Cal patients or reduce the care they provide. These cuts are set to take effect on July 1, 2026. Reducing the program by this much would severely weaken California’s dental safety net, putting access to care at risk for roughly 15 million people who rely on Medi-Cal Dental

POSITION: Oppose Cuts. 

HEARING DETAILS: Thursday, March 26 after 9:30 a.m. (may start in afternoon): Senate Budget Sub 3 at the Senate Swing Space (1021 O St, Sacramento, CA, Room 1200). This agenda item may not be heard until early afternoon and run until 5 p.m.  Public comment is at the end of the hearing.  Click HERE to view agenda.

WAYS TO GET INVOLVED:

Click HERE to learn more.

Monday, April 6: SB 1052 – SCDD Authorized Representatives

ABOUT SB 1052 (Gonzalez).  SB1052, introduced by Senator Lena Gonzalez, strengthens and clarifies Welfare and Institutions Code §4541 to ensure continuity of authorized representation for individuals with developmental disabilities served by regional centers. SB 1052 modernizes and clarifies the statute governing Authorized Representatives, which is a critical safeguard that protects civil rights when an individual with disabilities does not have a parent, guardian, or conservator legally authorized to assist them. Co-Sponsored by The Arc of California, State Council on Developmental Disabilities (SCDD), the Integrated Community Collaborative, and Disability Voices United.

POSITION: Support

HEARING DETAILS: Monday, April 6 after 3 p.m. at in Senate Health Services Committee at Senate Swing Space: 1021 O Street, Room 2200

WAYS TO GET INVOLVED:

Click HERE to learn more.

Tuesday, April 7 — AB 2347  Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training

ABOUT AB 2347 (Ahren).  Existing law defines a “hate crime” as a criminal act committed, in whole or in part, because of actual or perceived characteristics of the victim, including, among other things, race, religion, disability, and sexual orientation. Existing law requires the Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training (POST), in consultation with specified subject-matter experts, to develop guidelines and a course of instruction and training for law enforcement officers addressing hate crimes. Existing law also requires POST to consult with the subject-matter experts if the guidelines or course of instruction are updated. Beginning January 1, 2027, AB 2347 would require POST to conduct a comprehensive review of existing hate crimes training programs, as specified. The bill would require the review to be completed by January 1, 2028. The bill would require POST to, by July 1, 2028, adopt evidence-based training requirements to address the gaps identified in the review regarding the prevention, identification, and investigation of hate crimes.

POSITION: Support

HEARING DETAILS: Tuesday, April 7 at 8:30 a.m. in Assembly Public Safety Committee hearing at the State Capitol in Room 126

WAYS TO GET INVOLVED:

Click HERE to learn more.

Thank you to everyone in our community who continues to speak up, share your experiences, and stay engaged in the policymaking process. Advocacy takes time and effort, and your voice plays a critical role in shaping decisions that affect services, supports, and rights across California. Whether you attend a hearing, submit a comment, or simply stay informed, you are helping build a stronger, more inclusive future for all.